Michael Leifman is founder of Tenley Energy Innovation LLC and an energy strategist with 20+ years in climate risk, modeling, and decarbonization; former GE strategist and DOE/EPA analyst; M.S. Johns Hopkins & Carnegie Mellon, B.A. Chicago.
Data center developers are building a parallel “shadow grid” to bypass delays and costs. With 47 GW emerging—rivaling grid builds—this system is largely invisible to planners. FERC’s response may unintentionally push more operators fully off-grid, deepening coordination and reliability risks.
Michael Leifman
AI data center demand uncertainty is a governance failure, not a modeling problem. The article proposes five integrated regulatory tools to force transparency, align incentives, unlock flexibility, avoid overbuild, and protect ratepayers while accelerating decarbonization
Michael Leifman
The U.S. grid has ~100 GW of hidden capacity that data centers could unlock with tiny, well-timed curtailments. With stronger price signals—geometric demand charges and TOU surcharges—flexibility becomes profitable, enabling rapid AI load growth without new generation.
Michael Leifman
AI’s energy problem isn’t shortage—it’s misalignment. GPU clusters run at just 60–70% utilization due to data bottlenecks, creating hidden flexibility. With minimal peak curtailment, the grid could integrate ~100 GW of new load. Smarter governance—not more power—is the real solution.
Michael Leifman
AI developers are inflating power demand with phantom data centers—projects that exist on paper but never connect. Utilities build for the illusion, regulators approve the excess, and ratepayers bear the cost. Increased transparency can break the cycle.
Michael Leifman
AI has broken the grid’s forecasting logic. Data-center demand could double—or stall—by 2028. The problem isn’t prediction, it’s governance. Smarter rules, transparent data, and flexible pricing—not overbuild—will determine how well the grid survives the AI era.
Michael Leifman