Places AI and energy within a broader business frame: geopolitics, state competition, national policy, innovation, technology adoption, corporate strategy, and global energy outlooks. These articles connect near-term infrastructure constraints to long-term shifts in power, competitiveness, and industrial capacity.
Infrastructure planning once focused on forecasting demand. AI changes the challenge. The critical question is no longer how much demand will emerge, but which infrastructure commitments should be made before demand is fully known—and who bears the risk if assumptions prove wrong.
Brandon Owens
Hyperscalers are shifting from power buyers to grid architects. Through five partnership models they shape clean energy procurement and grid build-out—deciding whether AI demand locks in fossil fuels or accelerates zero-carbon supply.
Brandon Owens
AI’s environmental impact depends not only on data centers, chips, and power supply, but on how people use it. Sustainable AI requires purposeful prompting, right-sized models, less low-value output, and better “demand architecture” for computation.
Ian Todreas
AI is reshaping U.S. manufacturing into a data-driven, energy-intensive ecosystem. Reindustrialization hinges on reliable, low-carbon power and grid modernization—linking America’s industrial competitiveness to its energy infrastructure.
Brandon Owens
AI is reshaping energy: grids once built in decades now leapfrog with models, agents, and twins. Speed brings opportunity but erodes moats—durability now lies in adaptability, governance, and momentum. The grid is becoming a cognitive system, raising urgent questions of ownership and control.
Brandon Owens
OpenAI’s 6-GW deal with AMD marks AI’s growing dependence on real power. It’s a milestone linking silicon to substations, forcing planners and policymakers to treat compute demand as part of the energy system, not apart from it.
Brandon Owens